Friday, December 5, 2008
ODMG's not dead?
Seems OMG will host an Object Database Standard Definition Scope meeting in Santa Clara, next week.
ODMG's not dead?
Seems OMG will host an Object Database Standard Definition Scope meeting in Santa Clara, next week.
Versant acquired db4o yesterday
See the news from the Versant site and from the db4o blog.
Well, that the Enterprise ODBMS buying the embedded ODBMS. Don't know what it means to the ODBMS community. Does it means that eventually the db4o business model didn't work as expected despite the good image of the product and company on the market? I also don't clearly see what it means to the Poet's FastObject part of Versant...
I know both products quite well, and I know both teams share some common genuine values around quality and performance. Even if I now work for a company who owns ObjectStore, I wanted to send a sincere "good luck" to them.
Well, that the Enterprise ODBMS buying the embedded ODBMS. Don't know what it means to the ODBMS community. Does it means that eventually the db4o business model didn't work as expected despite the good image of the product and company on the market? I also don't clearly see what it means to the Poet's FastObject part of Versant...
I know both products quite well, and I know both teams share some common genuine values around quality and performance. Even if I now work for a company who owns ObjectStore, I wanted to send a sincere "good luck" to them.
Versant acquired db4o yesterday
See the news from the Versant site and from the db4o blog.
Well, that the Enterprise ODBMS buying the embedded ODBMS. Don't know what it means to the ODBMS community. Does it means that eventually the db4o business model didn't work as expected despite the good image of the product and company on the market? I also don't clearly see what it means to the Poet's FastObject part of Versant...
I know both products quite well, and I know both teams share some common genuine values around quality and performance. Even if I now work for a company who owns ObjectStore, I wanted to send a sincere "good luck" to them.
Well, that the Enterprise ODBMS buying the embedded ODBMS. Don't know what it means to the ODBMS community. Does it means that eventually the db4o business model didn't work as expected despite the good image of the product and company on the market? I also don't clearly see what it means to the Poet's FastObject part of Versant...
I know both products quite well, and I know both teams share some common genuine values around quality and performance. Even if I now work for a company who owns ObjectStore, I wanted to send a sincere "good luck" to them.
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
LINK like initiatives for Java
- LiquidForm: http://code.google.com/p/liquidform/
- JaQu from the H2 database.
- db4o is working on some kind of LINQ equivalent I think.
- JEQUEL.
- Quaere.
- LINQ for Java (Google Group).
- Query DSL.
LINK like initiatives for Java
- LiquidForm: http://code.google.com/p/liquidform/
- JaQu from the H2 database.
- db4o is working on some kind of LINQ equivalent I think.
- JEQUEL.
- Quaere.
- LINQ for Java (Google Group).
- Query DSL.
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
OJM
Object to JDBC Mapping: OJM.
Seems to me when I first saw that new TLA that it was a pure oxymore.
Reading the CPO web site just confirmed this. There are so many strange amd sometimes inaccurate statements on this page. The author seems to ignore what modern persistence is.
I really hate to be harsh like that, but is there really a need in 2008, for yet another JDBC abstraction?
Seems to me when I first saw that new TLA that it was a pure oxymore.
Reading the CPO web site just confirmed this. There are so many strange amd sometimes inaccurate statements on this page. The author seems to ignore what modern persistence is.
I really hate to be harsh like that, but is there really a need in 2008, for yet another JDBC abstraction?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
